1996 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan
To start off, 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan (175 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (67 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 875 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Dodge |
Model | Lancer | Grand Caravan |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 278 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1953 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1750 mm |