1996 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 1948 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna (141 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 256 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 1948 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Magna | 1948 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Magna | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1948 |
| Engine Size | 2351 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2850 mm |
