1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,833 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner (120 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner (164 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Space Runner | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1833 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2440 mm |
