1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2006 Volvo S40
To start off, 2006 Volvo S40 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 1,948 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S40 (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo S40 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (164 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2006 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Space Runner | S40 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1833 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 164 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2570 mm |