1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 1,833 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner (164 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Holden |
| Model | Space Runner | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1833 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2685 mm |
