1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 1,833 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner (120 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Space Runner | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1833 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2360 mm |
