1996 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 437 kg more than 1996 Nissan Cefiro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Nissan Cefiro | 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
| Make | Nissan | Mercury |
| Model | Cefiro | Grand Marquis |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1867 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5385 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1989 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
