1996 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2011 Audi RS3
To start off, 2011 Audi RS3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Nissan Cefiro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Nissan Cefiro | 2011 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Nissan | Audi |
| Model | Cefiro | RS3 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 335 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
