1996 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2012 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2012 Kia Sedona is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Sedona weights approximately 554 kg more than 1996 Nissan Cefiro.
Because 1996 Nissan Cefiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Nissan Cefiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Nissan Cefiro | 2012 Kia Sedona | |
| Make | Nissan | Kia |
| Model | Cefiro | Sedona |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 271 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1816 mm |
