1996 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER weights approximately 422 kg more than 1996 Nissan Cefiro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Nissan Cefiro | 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER | |
Make | Nissan | Dodge |
Model | Cefiro | CHALLENGER |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 367 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5023 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1449 mm |