1996 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2013 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. Both 1996 Nissan Cefiro and 2013 Volkswagen Eos are equipped with a 2,000 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 165 kg more than 1996 Nissan Cefiro.
Because 1996 Nissan Cefiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Nissan Cefiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Nissan Cefiro | 2013 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
| Model | Cefiro | Eos |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1595 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1791 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1443 mm |
