1996 Nissan Cima vs. 1984 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1996 Nissan Cima is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Cima weights approximately 255 kg more than 1984 Nissan Cedric.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Nissan Cima | 1984 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | Cima | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
