1996 Nissan Presea vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1996 Nissan Presea is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1983 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Nissan Presea. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1996 Nissan Presea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Toyota Celica weights approximately 150 kg more than 1996 Nissan Presea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Nissan Presea. (136 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1983 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Nissan Presea.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Nissan Presea | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Presea | Celica |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2640 mm |