1996 Nissan Presea vs. 2000 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Presea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Presea would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Presea is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Presea weights approximately 280 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Nissan Presea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 1996 Nissan Presea has manual transmission. 1996 Nissan Presea will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Nissan Presea | 2000 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | Presea | AZ |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2370 mm |