1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 would be higher. At 3,493 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (550 HP) has 432 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 481 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | R 390 GT1 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3493 cc | 1784 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 550 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 637 Nm | 156 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2610 mm |