1996 Nissan Stagea vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Nissan Stagea is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. Both 1996 Nissan Stagea and 1972 Triumph 2000 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan Stagea (130 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Stagea should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Stagea weights approximately 185 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan Stagea (175 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1996 Nissan Stagea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Nissan Stagea | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Stagea | 2000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |