1996 Nissan Stagea vs. 2010 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2010 Cadillac SRX is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Stagea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Stagea would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Nissan Stagea is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac SRX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Stagea will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan Stagea (362 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac SRX. (302 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan Stagea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac SRX. 2010 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1996 Nissan Stagea has manual transmission. 1996 Nissan Stagea will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Nissan Stagea | 2010 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | Stagea | SRX |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2568 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
Torque | 362 Nm | 302 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2807 mm |