1996 Nissan Terrano II vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Terrano II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Terrano II would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 30 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1996 Nissan Terrano II has manual transmission. 1996 Nissan Terrano II will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Nissan Terrano II | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Terrano II | Ranger |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2389 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3010 mm |