1996 Nissan Terrano II vs. 2009 Opel Combo
To start off, 2009 Opel Combo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Terrano II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Terrano II would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan Terrano II (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2009 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Terrano II should accelerate faster than 2009 Opel Combo.
Because 1996 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Opel Combo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan Terrano II (197 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Nissan Terrano II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Nissan Terrano II | 2009 Opel Combo | |
Make | Nissan | Opel |
Model | Terrano II | Combo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2389 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2720 mm |