1996 Oldsmobile Achieva vs. 2004 Renault Clio

To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 106 kg more than 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva.

Because 2004 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Oldsmobile Achieva 2004 Renault Clio
Make Oldsmobile Renault
Model Achieva Clio
Year Released 1996 2004
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 2400 cc 2946 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 251 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1310 kg 1416 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 3850 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1950 mm