1996 Oldsmobile Achieva vs. 2010 BMW 116
To start off, 2010 BMW 116 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW 116 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva.
Because 2010 BMW 116 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 BMW 116. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva | 2010 BMW 116 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | BMW |
| Model | Achieva | 116 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 121 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4239 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1748 mm |
