1996 Oldsmobile Achieva vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 605 kg more than 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva.

Because 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva has automatic transmission and 2011 Cadillac CTS-V has manual transmission. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Oldsmobile Achieva 2011 Cadillac CTS-V
Make Oldsmobile Cadillac
Model Achieva CTS-V
Year Released 1996 2011
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2400 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 556 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1310 kg 1915 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1842 mm