1996 Oldsmobile Achieva vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Juke weights approximately 120 kg more than 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva.
Because 2013 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Oldsmobile Achieva | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Nissan |
Model | Achieva | Juke |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1765 mm |