1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 704 kg more than 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Cutlass | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 2108 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 81 L |
