1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1974 TVR M
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 TVR M would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 635 kg more than 1974 TVR M.
Because 1974 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1974 TVR M has manual transmission. 1974 TVR M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1974 TVR M | |
Make | Oldsmobile | TVR |
Model | Cutlass | M |
Year Released | 1996 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2290 mm |