1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 229 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Plymouth |
| Model | Cutlass | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2470 mm |
