1996 Oldsmobile SS vs. 1980 Renault 4
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1980 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1980 Renault 4.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Renault 4. (62 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Renault 4. 1996 Oldsmobile SS has automatic transmission and 1980 Renault 4 has manual transmission. 1980 Renault 4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Oldsmobile SS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Oldsmobile SS | 1980 Renault 4 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
Model | SS | 4 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 318 Nm | 62 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1490 mm |