1996 Oldsmobile SS vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (380 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (140 Nm). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Oldsmobile SS | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
| Model | SS | 260 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2383 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2660 mm |
