1996 Oldsmobile SS vs. 1982 Suzuki SJ 410
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410.
Because 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (380 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Oldsmobile SS | 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Suzuki |
| Model | SS | SJ 410 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2040 mm |
