1996 Oldsmobile SS vs. 1997 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1997 Honda CR-V is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1997 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1997 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Honda CR-V. 1996 Oldsmobile SS has automatic transmission and 1997 Honda CR-V has manual transmission. 1997 Honda CR-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Oldsmobile SS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Oldsmobile SS | 1997 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Honda |
Model | SS | CR-V |
Year Released | 1996 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 318 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |