1996 Oldsmobile SS vs. 2001 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2001 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2001 SsangYong Rexton. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2001 SsangYong Rexton.
Because 2001 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (380 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 SsangYong Rexton. (256 Nm). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 SsangYong Rexton.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Oldsmobile SS | 2001 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Oldsmobile | SsangYong |
Model | SS | Rexton |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 256 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |