1996 Opel Astra vs. 2012 Mazda 3

To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Opel Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Opel Astra would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1996 Opel Astra. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Opel Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1996 Opel Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Opel Astra. (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Opel Astra.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Opel Astra 2012 Mazda 3
Make Opel Mazda
Model Astra 3
Year Released 1996 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1389 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 89 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 111 Nm 183 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1005 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 4280 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2639 mm