1996 Peugeot 106 vs. 1978 Volvo 164
To start off, 1996 Peugeot 106 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1996 Peugeot 106. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1996 Peugeot 106.
Because 1978 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Peugeot 106, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Volvo 164 (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Peugeot 106. (87 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1978 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Peugeot 106.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Peugeot 106 | 1978 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | 106 | 164 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3350 mm |