1996 Peugeot 106 vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Peugeot 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Peugeot 106 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1996 Peugeot 106. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1996 Peugeot 106.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Compass (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Peugeot 106. (87 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Peugeot 106.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Peugeot 106 | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Peugeot | Jeep |
Model | 106 | Compass |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 51 L |