1996 Peugeot 406 vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Peugeot 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Peugeot 406 would be higher. At 1,618 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Peugeot 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Peugeot 406 (88 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Peugeot 406 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Peugeot 406 (130 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Peugeot 406 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Peugeot 406 | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Peugeot | Renault |
Model | 406 | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1618 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |