1996 Peugeot Expert vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Peugeot Expert. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Peugeot Expert would be higher. At 2,183 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1996 Peugeot Expert has manual transmission. 1996 Peugeot Expert will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Peugeot Expert | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Peugeot | Mazda |
Model | Expert | 6 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 2183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |