1996 Pininfarina Eta vs. 1989 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 1996 Pininfarina Eta is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Pininfarina Eta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Pininfarina Eta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Pininfarina Eta | 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
| Make | Pininfarina | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Eta | 164 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2959 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
