1996 Pininfarina Eta vs. 1992 Acura Integra
To start off, 1996 Pininfarina Eta is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Pininfarina Eta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Pininfarina Eta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Pininfarina Eta has automatic transmission and 1992 Acura Integra has manual transmission. 1992 Acura Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Pininfarina Eta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Pininfarina Eta | 1992 Acura Integra | |
Make | Pininfarina | Acura |
Model | Eta | Integra |
Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |