1996 Pininfarina Eta vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Pininfarina Eta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Pininfarina Eta would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Pininfarina Eta has automatic transmission and 2012 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2012 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Pininfarina Eta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Pininfarina Eta | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Pininfarina | Cadillac |
| Model | Eta | CTS |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
