1996 Pininfarina Eta vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Pininfarina Eta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Pininfarina Eta would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Pininfarina Eta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Pininfarina Eta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Pininfarina Eta | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Pininfarina | Volvo |
| Model | Eta | S60 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
