1996 Plymouth Prowler vs. 1982 Toyota Starlet
To start off, 1996 Plymouth Prowler is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Starlet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Starlet would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Plymouth Prowler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Plymouth Prowler (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Starlet. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Plymouth Prowler should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Starlet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Plymouth Prowler weights approximately 589 kg more than 1982 Toyota Starlet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Plymouth Prowler | 1982 Toyota Starlet | |
Make | Plymouth | Toyota |
Model | Prowler | Starlet |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 75 L |