1996 Plymouth Voyager vs. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1996 Plymouth Voyager is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Plymouth Voyager weights approximately 821 kg more than 1990 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Plymouth Voyager has automatic transmission and 1990 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Plymouth Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Plymouth Voyager | 1990 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Plymouth | Toyota |
Model | Voyager | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1996 | 1990 |
Engine Size | 3778 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |