1996 Plymouth Voyager vs. 2010 Holden Calais

To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 213 more horse power than 1996 Plymouth Voyager. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1996 Plymouth Voyager.

Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Plymouth Voyager. (174 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Plymouth Voyager. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1996 Plymouth Voyager has manual transmission. 1996 Plymouth Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: