1996 Proton 300 vs. 1967 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1996 Proton 300 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 300 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1967 ZAZ 966.
Because 1967 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Proton 300 | 1967 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Proton | ZAZ |
| Model | 300 | 966 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1834 cc | 886 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2170 mm |
