1996 Proton 300 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 460 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 1996 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 1996 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 300 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
Make | Proton | Renault |
Model | 300 | Zo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2580 mm |