1996 Proton 300 vs. 2009 Nissan Note
To start off, 2009 Nissan Note is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 300 weights approximately 63 kg more than 2009 Nissan Note.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 300 | 2009 Nissan Note | |
Make | Proton | Nissan |
Model | 300 | Note |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2600 mm |