1996 Proton 300 vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S40 (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1996 Proton 300. (88 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S40 (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 300. (126 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 300. 2009 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 1996 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 1996 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 300 | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Proton | Volvo |
Model | 300 | S40 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1460 mm |