1996 Proton 300 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 1058 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse has automatic transmission and 1996 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 1996 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 300 | 2010 Chevrolet Traverse | |
Make | Proton | Chevrolet |
Model | 300 | Traverse |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 2173 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5207 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1991 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3020 mm |