1996 Proton 300 vs. 2010 Citroen C1
To start off, 2010 Citroen C1 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Proton 300 (88 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300 should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C1 weights approximately 432 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Proton 300 (126 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1996 Proton 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Proton 300 | 2010 Citroen C1 | |
Make | Proton | Citroen |
Model | 300 | C1 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1472 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2350 mm |