1996 Proton 300 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Proton 300 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Proton | Ford |
| Model | 300 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1834 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2619 mm |
